Fao Bbc Presenter Paying £35k For Photos

You're overpaying.

I will send you my naked photos (super sexy) for just £3500. A fraction of what you were paying.

Absolute discretion of course.

PM me. ;-)

 

A/S/L?

 

But who is the mystery fiend? My money's on David Attenborough.

 

His shows are full of sex already, so probably not him.

 

Oooh he is a dish.

I remember the days when The Sun would pay good money for naked pictures of 17 year olds.

 

Why arent the Police investigating this? Why did the family run to the press and not to the Police?

 

Who is it?

 

Would it be classed as making and possessing indecent images seeing as she was under 18?

 

Pretty sure I read somewhere it is a he not she. Either way really hope it’s Gary lineker

 

Hmm looks like it would be to be fair. One of the few sexual offences that defines a child as under 18 rather than 16.

Interesting you've presumed it's a she. I've taken it be a he given the tone of the reporting, though I suppose that's a presumption on my part.

 

If it was a she then why would Rylan be telling the world it wasn't him. Saw on BBC, (ironically), that it was a he.

 

Yep, you’re quite right, filled in the blank there so I did.

 

Wot do you class as ‘super sexy’?
Asking for a friend.

Wot is A/S/L?
Asking for (the same) friend - we are very naive on these matters.

 

I’m very confused by the assumption of the he or she.
The BBC have already informed us and our children that there are over 100 genders.
I’ll wait for the BBC to fact check, clarify and inform us of the correct nomenclature.

Good old reliable auntie beeb..

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9179703/BBC-programme-tells-9-year-olds-100-genders.html

 

We don’t have your ITK status!

Go on, tell. It would be great publicity for the forum!

 

Can you be half a dozen at the same time ?

 

Super sexy photos are the ones where I draw a big W on each buttock with a sharpie and then spell out WOW!!!

 

You can’t go anywhere without this Daily Mail culture war w*nk following you around.

 

The attack on the BBC is an attempt to remove an important pillar of our society.

With no independently accountable news source, everyone can get their news from within their own echo Chambers.

 

'Express is pretty good"

Has it changed since I last read a physical paper about 15 years ago?

 

Although apparently, according to the child’s mother, the BBC took no action in May (or June) after she reported it to them in May.
Interesting.
The BBC supply a good ‘impartial’ news service with a good worldwide reputation.
But apparently the wheels were only set in motion after the mother, apparently in frustration, went to the press.

BBC has previous in covering up what they know are serious scandals, although it’s to be proven, in the scheme of things, that this is a serious scandal.

What the Beeb are doing atm is stoking up a huge hornets nest of unwanted publicity when it could probably have been handled a lot better to minimise the fallout.

 

Hear, hear. 20 years ago failed has-beens like the smirking Patel would not be able to spout their nonsense once they were out of a public position, but now they can continue on Twitter and the like stoking up their fan base, which only increases division and hatred.

 

I think it's a close run thing between the Fail and the Getsworse.

I think the Getsworse just edges it if only for their almost weekly winter headline of ' Britain set to be paralysed by Arctic blast'.

Set your clock by it.

Hapless.

 

While there is a potential disciplinary matter, it’s one initially for the Police, if it is alleged a crime is committed. The BBC has to be careful not to undermine any investigation by the Police. This often causes delay (and frustration) when allegations are made to an employer or other disciplinary body.

If both the Police and BBC cannot get the alleged victim to provide evidence, it may not be an allegation that can be proved. Nevertheless, the BBC can then ask about the nature of the relationship and take action if they feel the presenter has behaved badly or inappropriately.

Some are taking the opportunity to have open season on the BBC and certain presenters, notably gay or left wing ones. But then they would. The BBC isn’t popular with culture warriors and homophobes.

 

I've read Jeremy Vine, Lenny Henry and Paddy McGuiness amongst others on twitter. I'm not convinced by any of them.

 

Lineker states it’s not him