Just heard on Sky Sports News that if they were trialled in Jan they could have got points deducted, however, as it means that they are more than likely to be relegated if they were deducted at the business end of the season. I say deduct them anyway. Chuck them out of the league... they can afford 5m, it wont stop them doing it again!!!!!! But what makes me laugh is the media are now blaming Magnussen as im not sure he was even at west ham at the time of the purchasing. Report says... By Trevor Huggins LONDON (Reuters) - West Ham United were fined a record 5.5 million pounds ($10.97 million) by a Premier League panel on Friday for breaching ownership rules over the signings of Argentines Carlos Tevez and Javier Mascherano last August. West Ham admitted the charges and avoided a points deduction that would have almost certainly condemned them to relegation from the Premier League. The fine is the biggest in English soccer history, dwarfing the old record of 1.5 million pounds imposed on Tottenham Hotspur in 1994 for financial irregularities, and reflected the club's "dishonesty and deceit" in the affair. The case centred on the third-party ownership of the players, who were signed from Brazilian club Corinthians but with contracts that involved giving rights to outside companies. The transfers effectively breached Premier League rule U18 that no club should enter into a contract enabling another party to influence its policies or performances. West Ham were also charged with failing to disclose details of the deals, thereby breaking rule B13, which obliges clubs to deal with each other and with the league in "utmost good faith." In its judgment, the independent commission said: "It is clear to us, and by their acceptance of the charge also to West Ham, that these contracts constitute a breach of Rule U18 and that those third parties acquired the ability materially to influence the club's policies or performance of the team." The panel added: "These are exceedingly serious allegations because they amount to not only an obvious and deliberate breach of the Rules, but a grave breach of trust as to the FAPL (Premier League) and its constituent members, because in our finding the club has been responsible for dishonesty and deceit." The latter refers to a conversation in September between Premier League chief executive Richard Scudamore and then West Ham chief executive Paul Aldridge. Wanting to know how West Ham had managed to get two member of Argentina's World Cup squad without a fee, Scudamore asked Aldridge if there was any paperwork the FAPL had not seen - only to be assured there was none, the commission said. It added: "An officer of the club, its chief executive officer, told Mr Scudamore a direct lie, namely there was no documentation of whatever kind in respect of these players which the FAPL had not seen." MITIGATING FACTORS Despite the seriousness of the affair, the commission took into account several mitigating factors. Top of the list was that the club admitted the charges and that it had changed ownership in November, with new chairman Eggert Magnusson at the head of an Icelandic consortium. As for the sanctions, it said: "Some clubs, perhaps those who are locked in the relegation battle with West Ham, may be of the view that only a points deduction would be appropriate. "We have finally come to the view that a deduction of points would not be proportionate punishment... (it) would have consigned the club to certain relegation." The commission fined West Ham 2.5 million pounds for rule-breaking and 3.0 million pounds for the non-disclosure, while the Premier League were given the right to terminate Tevez's registration. In turn, the league have given West Ham until 1100 GMT on Saturday, three hours before they play Wigan Athletic, to remove the third-party ownership aspects of Tevez's registration. West Ham are 19th in the 20-team league with three games to play. After the verdict, West Ham said on their Web site: "The club regrets the fact that they fell foul of the FA Premier League regulations, but the new owners of the club now want to focus on matters on the pitch and remaining in the Premier League. "The threat of a points deduction has now been removed and the club's fate remains in its own hands. "The club will reflect on the financial penalty that has been imposed and will take advice before commenting on the possibility of an appeal or any further steps that might be taken." They are giving free travel tomorrow... http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/football/premiership/west_ham/article1701333.ece
like it will bother them one bit take 10 points of or more make them go down with less than us lol thats what i want
I think this was a soft touch as they can afford the money even if the current owners weren't involved at the time. They should have had points deducted - they might even have finished below us then. Listening to Talk Sport yesterday and they pointed out that even though they may be relegated anyway, Tevez has helped them to win games - or at least draw and it may well have ended up that they would have finished bottom without him. Therefore they said points should have been deducted.
Points should have been deducted if they are guilty. The fine can be written off easily by the owners so isn't much of a punishment.
