Posts where Hooter accuses me of something are not hard to find. The forum search engine can only do 200 mentions, but that’s probably enough to be going on with.
Made me laugh when he accused you of saying a naughty word towards a group of people, I asked him to show me where you said it and then he said something like "Well he didn't say the word in regard to them" - so uhh what's your point?
Here’s one he made earlier. He followed it up with a madcap post about how abortion is a genocide of black people by white liberals and therefore I support genocide and racism. Brilliant.
I do usually refer to the comments made when I make a criticism. And you do have the right to respond; no one is trying to ban you from the conversation. It is not in my interest to shut you up. It is better for me if people can read your posts. Otherwise, without the proof, I would just appear like a bully.
"I'm the ******* president, take me up to the Capitol" "Mr president, take your hands off the steering wheel" https://www.indy100.com/politics/trump-steering-wheel-beast-january-6 Keep the video going - you'll love the bit where Trump's Maccie D leaves a trail of ketchup down the Oval Office wall when he sees Barr's interview with AP.
Devaststing. But sadly just second hand hear say in respect of a court of law, with no examination of the statement. But at least we know why he was unable to go to the Capitol to call off the dogs.
Its not just Trump that's ******* mental. Guilliani claims he could've died after this "horrendous assault" where somebody tapped him on the back. https://twitter.com/scottgal/status/1541388488947400704?t=NM52UAwMDjjbhR-hGOQAUg&s=19
"Hutchinson testified under oath that Trump was deeply angered by the fact that some of his supporters who had gathered on the National Mall were not entering the secure perimeter for the Save America rally at the Ellipse where he was due to make remarks. The supporters did not want to enter the secure perimeter, Hutchinson testified, because many were armed with knives, blades, pepper spray and, as it later turned out, guns, and did not want to surrender their weapons to the Secret Service to attend the rally. “I don’t ******* care that they have weapons. They’re not here to hurt me,” Trump exclaimed in an extraordinary outburst of fury, according to Hutchinson. “Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here. Let the people in. Take the ******* mags [magnetometers] away.” The response from the former president is significant for two main reasons: it makes clear that he had been informed that his supporters were carrying weapons, and that he knew those armed people intended to make a non-permitted march to the Capitol."
Laura Ingraham, who was publicly blaming Antifa on Fox, sent these texts to Mark Meadows: Ever feel like you've been had?
Do not expect any prosecutions based on what you have seen so far, particularly not the evidence of Hutchinson, who, if it had escaped your attention, was not a witness to the events she testified to. That, and it is utter rubbish that contradicts the DOJ’s own evidence and the evidence of the committee. NO ONE was charged with gun possession or related offences at the Capitol that day. Are the Dems suggesting they all handed their assault rifles in at the magnetometers (who calls a metal detector a magnetometer? FFS*). Not very good insurrectionists if true. If this went to court, she would not be called as a witness. She testified to hear say, virtually nothing she says is first hand, and what she has said is contested by people who were with Trump. This evidence was supposed to have been so imperative and crucial that they had to meet yesterday, yet she gave a deposition some time ago, and her ‘testimony’ yesterday consisted of her being shown that deposition, and being asked to confirm what was said in it. This whole thing would have been laughed at in court, and virtually all of the evidence presented, in all the hearings so far, would not have been permissible as hear say, and the witnesses would have been destroyed in cross questioning. *This is very pertinent. The Commission used her as the source for the meaning of Mags as magnetometers, rather than magazines as most people would have interpreted (making Trump’s call a demand to disarm), yet the average WH aide would not call a metal detector a mag, or known what a mag was. The implication being that this had been explained to her by the committee, to portray the story they wanted. That, as the committee itself pointed out yesterday when attempting to point fingers at Trump supporters, is illegal. A chance to cross question her would have drawn that matter out. That is the advantage of having set up a clown court where no alternative view is desirable. It is disgusting, and if there is anything to the arguments they are making, it is being completely undermined by the absurdity of a Government that feels it is all powerful.
He did tell them to go home. Just because you don’t want to hear it, and just because the Dems have carefully edited out any words he said that contradict their narrative, doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. Bet you haven’t seen all of this video, because the Committee have edited it down to tell their story… Just because you don't agree with his message or opinion, it is no reason to deny reality. Ultimately, such silliness tends to catch up with you. So, we can be pretty sure, then, that lots of people not only enjoy being had, but are also extremely prone to asking for more...
Careful what you wish for. Given current fuel prices and the state of the US economy, it's not impossible he could sneak in again as things stand. US voters are notoriously fickle when economic times are bad and fuel prices high.
I imagine he would win, unless there are some serious changes in fortune for Biden, but I am not at all convinced it would be the best outcome; unless he was the only person who could beat the Dems!! I would be happy as long as it isn't the Democrats, because everything they said Trump was, turned out to be what they are.
Video evidence of Trump returning from his speach in an SUV, and not 'The Beast' as testified by the former White House aid who was not present at the time to witness what actually happen. But she said what you wanted to hear, so F it. The guy who she was testifying about has said she is talking BS. The secret service is stating it is BS. Trump has said that her job was making sure there was diet coke in the Oval Office fridge, and she filled it with Pepsi at least twice. She applied for a job with Trump later in January, after being horrified by his behaviour on Jan 6, but was turned down. Looks like Trump might really regret snubbing her, eh.
Lots of people have asked me to repost this since it got taken down (posted on the wrong thread, so nothing untoward), so this is for you guys. Evil witch Nancy Pelosi assaults the young child of a Mexican imigrant after said migrant became the first Mexican born congressperson. Unfortunately for Nancy, she is a Republican... I like the way the kid is not intimidated by the bullying speaker of the house. Enjoy the rest of the video. Bit of cope going on there. Or is that how you guys think kids should be dealt with?
I could give you names, but they would kill me. Suffice to say, most of the people I speak with, who use this forum, I do so in person. Except for Iamof, who sends me coded info packets via the sub ether from his mountain top lair in the Himalayas. Why the surprise? Don't you have friends? And no comment on Pelosi?
Warning, someone has tried to bleep out the expletives on this video, featuring a very angry leftie ranting about Democrats using Roe v Wade to fundraise, after 50 years of promising to codify it into law. But I think a few may have slipped through. Do not link to this video if you are offended by use of the F word. There are a few around like this, but they don't come up on Youtube or Google. May or may not turn into an issue (even if they don't like what Pelosi and co are doing, they certainly won't be voting Republican). But it is an insight into how the impact of the court's decision is not panning out the way Dems assumed it would.
Ever stop to think for a moment that posting thousands and thousands of words about US politics on a football forum where each post in this section is probably read by 8-10 people, none of whom you are going to convince to change their viewpoint, might be a waste of your life? Is this the only forum you do it on or are you on loads of them?
Trump has obviously concluded that somewhere, at some level, the Jan 6th Committee hearings are damaging him and his election chances, as he's now freed Bannon up to testify: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-62117137
Well, that or he believes the Dems unhinged hatred for him can best be exposed for what it is, by them insisting on prosecuting Bannon on a procedure (for which he has a reasonable argument for ignoring), when they will now appear to be desperate for him not to discuss the things he refused to discuss, because the public will wonder why they now, apparently, don't want him to talk. The Dems have a perfectly good reason for doing this, but it is their own fault that there are now gray areas, due to confusions caused by their gaslighting and dog whistling. The issue is that they want to give the impression that Bannon IS being tried for Jan 6 offences (he is not), so Trump is making it about those alleged offences, and the public will wonder why, all of a sudden, the Dems don't want it to be about Jan 6 anymore. And, in the eyes of many Americans on both sides, if it is not about Jan 6, then WTF are they doing it for, other than to maliciously prosecute a political opponent? They will look evasive and contradicory, and it will be their own fault for demonising Trump and his associates, and trying to fool the public that this is anything to do with insurrection.
Not only was Bannon not employed at the White House at the time, but Biden already waived any privilege concerns, AND a court filing has been made which specifically notes Trump never invoked privilege anyway. The whole thing would be a hilarious clusterf*ck if it wasn't so serious.
Love the headline on this. https://abovethelaw.com/2022/07/geo...-fault-or-the-prosecutor-is-mean-or-squirrel/
